|
Ideas About Social Housing
John Sewell has spent much of his political life ruminating about
social housing and helping to ensure that it is constructed.
He was actively involved in putting together the purchase agreement
that resulted in Toronto’s first non-profit co-operative in
the early 1970s, the Don Area Co-operative Housing Incorporated (DACHI.)
He helped forge the purchase agreement for the Bain Avenue project
that the city agreed to assume, and then worked with residents to
convince the city to convert it to a tenant controlled non-profit
co-operative. He was actively involved in promoting the City’s
assisted housing program in the 1970s, and as Mayor was chair of
the City’s non-profit housing company, Cityhome.
In 1986 he
was appointed by the provincial government as the full-time Chair
of the Metro Toronto Housing Authority, which managed about
35,000 assisted housing units in Toronto, providing homes to more
than 100,000 residents. He held that position for a two-year period
during which time he created a program of reforming public housing
in Toronto to better serve tenants and to better use the subsidy
dollars supplied by the public sector. Unfortunately, that program
fell into abeyance when he was not re-appointed.
Since the mid-1990s
he has been working with tenants in several projects to help redesign
housing sites in downtown Toronto.
John’s book Houses
and Homes: Housing for Canadians was published in 1994.
It summarizes the key issues around housing and housing
development in Canada.
*
There are two basic kinds of social housing in Canada: public
housing, and non-profit housing.
Public housing consists of
large projects developed by provincial governments (particularly
the Ontario provincial government)
in the 1950s, 60s and early 70s. The model for public housing
was
generally
Regent Park, a large project undertaken by the City of Toronto
after World Ward II, and promoted as the model in which other
levels of
government should participate. Two characteristics mark public
housing projects.
First, all of the units are occupied by
households with low income, whose rents are subsided so residents
pay no more
than 30% of
their income in rent (in the past this was 25%). Tenants
whose income
rises to what might be called an average amount find their
rent is so high
it’s better if they move out. This means projects
always consist of low income households.
The second characteristic
of public housing is design.
In most cases public housing projects are based on modern
planning
principles. Units do not access public streets, but open
onto
anonymous garden
space or private walkways. The problems with this kind
of design are described in Chapter 8 of Houses
and Homes,
and
in Chapter
8
of The Shape of the City. Governments stopped funding
new public housing the early 1970s.
The second kind of social housing
in Canada is non-profit housing. This includes non-profit housing
owned by municipalities,
by
social agencies and unions, and tenant-controlled non-profit
co-operatives.
Non-profit housing has two general characteristics.
First, it is designed to related to public streets and eschews
general modern
planning principles. Second, most non-profit projects
include a mix of incomes so that no more than half
of the units
are occupied
by
persons on low income - the remainder are rented at
market rates. These characteristics are more fully described
in Chapter 9 of
Houses and Homes and Chapter 6 of The
Shape of the City. Non-profit housing
relied on guarantees of capital funding from the federal
and provincial
governments, as well as operating subsidies from them.
The federal government terminated these subsidies for
new projects
in 1991
and most provincial governments followed suit soon
thereafter.
In the 21st century governments have been rethinking
the need for new social housing as homelessness has
soared in the intervening
years after the non-profit programs were ended The
exact form these
programs will take is still unclear. Some are suggesting
capital subsidies, some are suggesting rent supplement.
One expects
a number of experiments to occur with the limited
funding made available
by the federal government for the next few years.
|